What this site is not

We do not run press releases as content. Marketing copy from 155.io or its operators is read, then ignored. The only exception is when a press release contains a verifiable factual claim about Chicken Train, in which case we cite it and check it.

Contact

Write to [email protected] for corrections, methodology disputes, or operator-related concerns. We try to respond within a working week. Reader-submitted session data is welcome and is occasionally what triggers a page refresh.

The team

Chicken Train Editorial Team is five people. We work out of Lisbon most days, with two contributors remote. None of us are full-time at this site; the project sits alongside other industry work, mostly research at iGaming consultancies and player-protection organisations.

Bylines on individual reviews credit the team, not a single name. The reason is practical: the analysis is built collectively, and crediting one author would misstate who did the work.

Method, briefly

Every page goes through the same testing pass before publication: 100 rounds at a fixed bet to anchor the variance read, a rotation through the available risk levels of Chicken Train, and pre-declared cash-out targets that we record against the actual outcome.

The 97% RTP claim from 155.io is the most-cited figure in our reviews. We re-derive it from session data on every refresh and publish both numbers when they diverge by more than half a point.

The data behind these reviews

The Chicken Train session log is the working document behind every page on this site. Each row is a single round, played at a real bet on a licensed operator, with the multiplier and cash-out point recorded as it happened.

When a page references 646+ Chicken Train rounds in our analysis, that figure is current as of January 2026. Older snapshots stay live but are marked as such in the page header.